Biostatistics Research - Statistics, Uncertainty, Probability, Modeling

Biostatistics Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Biostatistics, including details on statistics, uncertainty, probability, modeling.


Biostatistics Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Biostatistics

Books on Biostatistics

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Body mass index, metabolic syndrome, and risk of type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular disease.

Meigs JB, Wilson PW, Fox CS, Vasan RS, Nathan DM, Sullivan LM, D'Agostino RB

General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, 9th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA. jmeigs@partners.org

CONTEXT: Metabolic risk conferred by adiposity may be due to associated risk factor clustering. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess risk for diabetes or cardiovascular disease (CVD) stratified by body mass index (BMI) and the presence or absence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) or insulin resistance (IR). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a community-based, longitudinal study of 2902 people (55% women, mean age 53 yr) without diabetes or CVD in 1989-1992 followed for up to 11 yr. We categorized subjects by normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m(2)), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m(2)), or obese (>30 kg/m(2)) and by the National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel MetS or the top quartile of homeostasis model IR. We used proportional hazard models to estimate risk relative to normal weight and no MetS or IR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incident type 2 diabetes (treatment or fasting glucose > or = 7 mmol/liter, 141 events) or CVD (myocardial infarction, stroke, or claudication, 252 events) were measured. RESULTS: Among 1056 normal-weight subjects, 7% had MetS and a risk factor-adjusted relative risk for diabetes of 3.97 (95% confidence interval, 1.35-11.6) and for CVD of 3.01 (1.68-5.41). Among 638 obese subjects, 37% did not have MetS or significantly increased risk. Obese subjects with MetS had an adjusted relative risk for diabetes of 10.3 (5.44-19.5) and for CVD of 2.13 (1.43-3.18). Results were similar in analyses of BMI-IR categories. CONCLUSIONS: People with normal weight and MetS or IR or with obesity but no MetS or IR were not uncommon in our sample. Risk factor clustering or IR appear to confer much of the risk for diabetes or CVD commonly associated with elevated BMI.

Published 8 August 2006 in J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 91(8): 2906-12.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Biostatistics Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Biostatistics Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)



Biostatistics Books

Biostatistics:  The Bare Essentials 3/E (Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials Biostatistics: The Bare E)

Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials 3/E (Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials Biostatistics: The Bare E)